Reprints Online

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Political Magicianship


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 651
Date:
Political Magicianship
Permalink  
 


One of the elements of a successful stage magician is misdirection of the audience's attention. Without mastering that skill, a stage magician is nothing more than a sideshow, background noise. Indeed, both political parties have been to magic school, and both parties have been hard at work to misdirect our attention to anything other than real pressing issues, particularly when it comes to self-created morasses and performance shortcomings.

Congress debates changing automotive fuel economy standards, and all admire them for being persons of action. There is a little name-calling, to make it look like good, old-fashioned debate, but there is something more going on behind the scenes. If automotive economy standards were to be raised, a phenomenon known as Jevon's Paradox will kick in. Jevon's Paradox states that any increase in the efficiency of use of a resource is accompanied by an increase in the actual use of that resource. In other words, if the distance a gallon of gas will move a person doubles, the amount of driving that person does is likely to triple. The market economy almost guarantees that this will be so, because its goal is to produce as much as possible, and all production involves consumption.

And the real fact, that gasoline costs $3 per gallon, appears to be dealt with, yet is not. There are all kinds of conditions and timelines, and everyone must have patience and understanding. . . ad nauseam. Now, do not fret; real action is being taken to affect that unpalatable truth. The United States is preparing to invade yet another sovereign state, the Islamic Republic of Iran, which also happens to have immense oil resources. The wind-up is not as pronounced as the wind-up for invading Iraq was, but a cursory analysis of public statements by administration officials like Condoleeza Rice make it clear that the United States has set its sights on its next target.

The news about the invasion of Iraq has slowed to a trickle, but on average, more than 60 flag-draped coffins arrive at Dover AFB in Delaware each month, carrying the remains of U.S. soldiers, the majority of whom are in the reserves, not the regular military. The U.S. invaded Iraq and destabilized the region, which caused instability and uncertainty in the oil market, which had predictable results at the gas pump. Please look at something else.

That is why last month illegal immigration came to the top of the national agenda. A further misdirection of our attention, we discussed whether people who come here willing to take wages no American citizen could live on are criminals or not. Illegal immigrants serve an economic purpose, and in the United States, the official religion has always been economics. The crucial issue in the debate was that we were not discussing the pending invasion of Iran, the current problem in Iraq, nor the fact that as much as the Democrats like to posture, in the last eight years they have done nothing so much as prove that they are part of the problem.

Politicians, all politicians, rise to the top of the heap in direct proportion to their usefulness to others. John helps Mary, so Mary owes John. Mary helps John move up a rung in the power structure, and now John owes Mary. It takes a lot of Marys to move John to the top, so he ends up owing everyone for his rise, and since it takes a lot of help to stay on top, the political Johns of the world are always dependent on those whose help put them in office. Now for the surprise: it ain't the voters that the Johns are beholden to. The Democrats in power have done so little to reflect the views of Americans who oppose the war, that calling them unresponsive is an understatement.

And so, while we watch the national sideshow of congress tackling "issues" made for sound bites (like penalties for oil-company price-gouging), the machine rolls ever faster downhill. The cliff ahead is clearly visible to anyone whose gaze is not misdirected. So, what do you think the invasion of Iran would do to the price of gas? © 2006

About the Author

Ann Weaver Hart is a political writer in Bryan, Texas. She publishes the Handbasket Chronicles Her e-mail address is annhart@columnist.com.




__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard