Reprints Online

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Why Not Just Shoot Network TV and Get it Over With?


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 651
Date:
Why Not Just Shoot Network TV and Get it Over With?
Permalink  
 


Somebody take CBS, ABC, NBC and Fox into the back pasture and shoot them.

Put these poor derelict remnants of government-in-broadcast out of their misery. Either that, or drive a stake through the heart of the FCC. What a long, long slide downhill it's been from Walter Cronkite retiring with total domination of the nightly news, to Dan Rather eased-out with cable too dominant to compete with, news budgets all but gone and Network market-share in the dumper.

The TV most of us grew up with is an aging fighter, punch-drunk and staggering with one arm governmentally tied behind it, hoping to make it to another round. The match has long been lost, just please let us get off the ropes for one more round.

Was it a 'golden age,' those days of Mary Tyler Moore and Mayberry RFD? Did we actually stay home on Saturday nights to watch the most successful shows ever aired? Did we care about M.A.S.H. and All In The Family? Was Cher a babe?

Seems to me that those simpler days of Network TV are like all the remembered simpler days--part myth, part nostalgia and irretrievably gone. I can't help it, I liked Johnny Carson and the big, thin steering wheels of old Packards when they were new and you were still able to Ask the Man Who Owns One. They're a couple decades apart within the memory-calendar, but nostalgia is like that, a mixed metaphor of mixed images and tastes and smells.

The FCC can't quite bear to kill off network TV, but they're apparently determined to torture it to death. Like pulling the wings off of flies, they keep upping the ante of the indecency, obscenity and profanity fines, whatever indecency means, however obscenity is defined and whenever the language we use leaks into the language we hear on the tube.

Tiresome, but true, we've sacrificed more than sixty years of television's occasional greatness (and more usual dreary decline to the worship of the youth market), not to competition but to the preventing of competition. The Moral Minority, unable to keep society from boozing and utterly defeated by our national drug habit, ineffectual at keeping their own kids from a healthy sexual interest, has decided to police yours and mine by the most draconian of measures.

Who in the hell are these constant consensual complainers?

Broadcasters are prohibited, by statute and regulation, from airing obscene programming at any time, i.e., material having a tendency to excite lustful thoughts. That's a direct quote from the FCC web site.

Excite lustful thoughts.

Please tell me just whose business that is? Anyone who has ever been seventeen years old can tell you how easily excited those old lustful thoughts can be.

Which is pretty much the greatest thing about being seventeen.

"The FCC staff must analyze what was actually aired, the meaning of what was aired, and the context in which it was aired," (again, from their site) which ought to keep various staff members in a fairly constant state of salivation and various other bodily wetnesses. If only there were a safe harbor from all this lasciviousness.

Funny you should mention that.

There is indeed a "safe harbor" and it occurs in the eyes and minds of the FCC at a time period between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m., local time. During these hours, a station may air indecent and/or profane material. It seems, in the twisted logic of the morally majoritized, that safe harbor means staying up late and missing a good night's sleep. The harbor they have contrived tends to excite lustful thoughts, but only among the older bones.

But there's no safe harbor for the broadcast of obscene material which, (according to those who guard our morals) may not be broadcast at any time. Someone better run out and tell the cable channels. Lotta lustful stuff going on there.

Again, according to the FCC site,

Do the FCC's rules apply to cable and satellite programming? In the past, the FCC has enforced the indecency and profanity prohibitions only against conventional broadcast services, not against subscription programming services such as cable and satellite. However, the prohibition against obscene programming applies to subscription programming services at all times.

Have they ever fined a subscription programmer? Are you kidding? Put all that hot programming at risk? Surely you jest. The Moral Minority are all cable-guys.

They only want to shoot the horse that no longer pulls their wagon.

About the Author

As a political commentator, Jim Freeman's op-ed pieces have appeared on the pages of The New York Times, Chicago Tribune, International Herald-Tribune, CNN, The Jon Stewart Daily Show and a number of magazines. His commentary is available at http://www.opinion-columns.com/

Jim is the author of three novels, EVOKE, Letters From Ceilia and The Island, as well as numerous travel pieces. His poetry and certain other works, including substantial




__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard